Pathogenic XPO1 variants cause a dominant neurodevelopmental disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: XPO1 functions in key cellular processes, including nucleo-cytoplasmic export and mitosis. The gene is deleted in a subset of patients with the 2p15p16.1 microdeletion syndrome; however, no monogenic XPO1-related disorder has been described to date. METHODS: We collected clinical data of individuals with de novo XPO1 variants through online matchmaking. We used Drosophila to study XPO1 function in development and habituation learning. RESULTS: A total of 22 individuals met the criteria to be included in the main study cohort. Of these, half have putative loss-of-function variants, and half have coding variants (10 missense and 1 in-frame deletion variant). We found an overlapping phenotype, consistent with a monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder. We demonstrate XPO1 functions in development by ubiquitous and neuron-specific knockdown in Drosophila. GABAergic neuron specific knockdown flies demonstrated impaired habituation. CONCLUSION: Our results establish XPO1 as a novel dominant monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder gene and demonstrate a central role for XPO1 in development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".