Mixture of Submodules for Domain Adaptive Person Search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing technique on domain adaptive person search commonly utilizes the unified framework for jointly localizing and identifying the person across domains. This framework, however, inevitably results in the gradient conflict problem, particularly in cross-domain scenarios with contradictory objectives, as the unified framework employs shared parameters to simultaneously address person detection and re-identification tasks across the domains. To over-come this, we present a novel mixture of submodules framework, dubbed MoS, that dynamically modulates the combination of submodules depending on the specific task to perform person detection and re-identification, separately. We further design the mixtures of submodules that vary depending on the domain, enabling domain-specific knowledge transfer. Especially, we decompose the main model into several submodules and employ diverse mixtures of submodules that vary depending on the tasks and domains through the conditional routing policy. In addition, we also present counterpart domain sample generation that synthesizes the augmented sample and uses them to learn domain invariant representation for person re-identification through the contrastive domain alignment. We conduct experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our MoS over the existing domain adaptive person search method and provide ablation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".