MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413156953 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3598585

A Modulation Scheme for Enhanced Performance of Hybrid Source Inverters in Electric Vehicles Application

2025· article· en· W4413156953 on OpenAlexafffund
Javad Ebrahimi, Hosein Ghojavand, Suzan Eren

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModulation (music)Scheme (mathematics)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having single stage conversion and combining different energy sources, hybrid source inverters (HSIs) are recognized as a viable solution for driving electric vehicles (EV). With only one path between each source and motor, efficiency and power density increase in these inverters. For modulation, in the literature, the classic space vector modulation (SVM) technique is employed. Although this modulation is simple, it suffers from high switching frequency, high switching loss, high and uneven thermal distribution between switches. In this article, a new reconstructed vector-based modulation technique for enhanced operation of HSIs is proposed and verified with simulation and experimental prototype. This modulation takes advantage of using reconstructed space vectors, and instead of using only one dc voltage level for each mode, it uses different dc voltage sources to construct the reference voltage, which leads to switching frequency distribution, better thermal junction profile and improved efficiency. These two modulation techniques are compared across various metrics, including junction temperature profile, efficiency, output total harmonic distortion (THD), and switching and conduction losses and significant improvements are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207