MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Series Active Filtering Technique for L-type Single-Phase Bridge Inverter

2025· article· en· W4413157349 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterComputer scienceBridge (graph theory)Half bridgeType (biology)H bridgeSeries (stratigraphy)Active filterPhase (matter)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The L-filter is a key constraint that limits the power density of a single-phase bridge inverter, whose physical size increases with lower switching frequency and higher power ratings. This paper presents a series active filtering technique for L-type single-phase bridge inverters, which introduces an extra bridge circuit to significantly reduce the inductor size. The operating principles of passive and active filters are discussed and compared. Simulation has been run in MATLAB/SIMULINK for single-phase bridge inverter under unipolar sinusoidal pulse width modulation (unipolar SPWM). Results show that the L-filter inductance of single-phase bridge inverter has successfully been reduced by 75% with active filtering technique, while the harmonic content of output current remains the same, which verified the feasibility of the presented series active filtering technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it