MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combining Matrix Pencil Algorithm with Random Sampling for Partial CSI Estimation

2024· article· en· W4413157497 on OpenAlexaff
Sen Meng, Shuai Han, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMatrix pencilAlgorithmComputer scienceMatrix algebraPencil (optics)Sampling (signal processing)Matrix (chemical analysis)Computer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OTFS (Orthogonal time frequency space) technology is promising for 6G high mobility communication systems. This paper focuses on practical parameter estimation based on dual dispersion channels in the Multiple-Input Multiple-Output-OTFS (MIMO-OTFS) system paradigm. Due to the presence of fractional Doppler, channel index estimation is no longer a simple sparse recovery problem. This paper proposes a matrix pencil algorithm for estimating angles and combining it with the Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate the channel integer index for delayed Doppler domain modulation in this situation. The simulation results show that in down-link estimation. The results showed that both the angle and index estimation at the receiving end achieve good Normalized Mean Square Error (NMSE) performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207