MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413158040 · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01568

ONDA-Pose: Occlusion-Aware Neural Domain Adaptation for Self-Supervised 6D Object Pose Estimation

2025· article· en· W4413158040 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Tan, Qiulei Dong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoseArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDomain adaptationComputer visionObject (grammar)3D pose estimationAdaptation (eye)Domain (mathematical analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)OcclusionEstimationArtificial neural networkMathematicsPsychologyEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-supervised 6D object pose estimation has received increasing attention in computer vision recently. Some typical works in literature attempt to translate the synthetic images with object pose labels generated by object CAD models into the real domain, and then use the translated data for training. However, their performance is generally limited, since (i) there still exists a domain gap between the translated images and the real images and (ii) the translated images can not sufficiently reflect occlusions that exist in many real images. To address these problems, we propose an Occlusion-Aware Neural Domain Adaptation method for self-supervised 6D object Pose estimation, called ONDA-Pose. The proposed method comprises three main steps. Firstly, by utilizing both the training real images without pose labels and a CAD model, we explore a CAD-like radiance field for rendering corresponding synthetic images that have similar textures to those generated by the CAD model. Then, a backbone pose estimator trained on the synthetic data is employed to provide initial pose estimations for the synthetic images rendered from the CAD-like radiance field, and the initial object poses are refined by a global object pose refiner to generate pseudo object pose labels. Finally, the backbone pose estimator is further self-supervised as the final pose estimator by jointly utilizing the real images with pseudo object pose labels and the synthetic images rendered from the CAD-like radiance field. Experimental results on three public datasets demonstrate that ONDA-Pose significantly outperforms the comparative state-of-the-art methods in most cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207