MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM for ISI Mitigation in Molecular Communication for Nanosensors with Imperfect Transmitter

2025· article· en· W4413158079 on OpenAlexaff
Linjuan Li, Dongliang Jing, Andrew W. Eckford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanosensorImperfectTransmitterComputer scienceNanotechnologyTelecommunicationsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inter-symbol interference (ISI) mitigation is a critical challenge in diffusion-based molecular communication systems for nanosensors due to the inherent channel memory at the nanoscale. In the presence of an imperfect transmitter, the emitted molecules include interference components, further complicating signal decoding at the receiver. Traditional ISI mitigation techniques often rely on precise channel state information, which is time-varying and computationally demanding. To address this issue, we propose a hybrid deep learning model, C-BiLSTM, which integrates convolutional neural networks (CNN) for local feature extraction and bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) networks for capturing long-range dependencies. The model is trained and decoded using received time-window sequences to enhance detection performance. Simulation results demonstrate that C-BiLSTM achieves a lower bit error rate (BER) than CNN alone and approaches the optimal detection performance. These findings highlight the potential of deep learning-based approaches for ISI mitigation, offering a promising solution for enhancing reliability in molecular communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207