MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413160539 · doi:10.3390/make7030082

Multilayer Perceptron Mapping of Subjective Time Duration onto Mental Imagery Vividness and Underlying Brain Dynamics: A Neural Cognitive Modeling Approach

2025· article· en· W4413160539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionDuration (music)Dynamics (music)Mental imagePsychologyMultilayer perceptronArtificial intelligenceNeural correlates of consciousnessCognitive psychologyArtificial neural networkNeuroimagingComputer scienceNeuroscienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a recent experimental phenomenology–information processing theory, the sensory strength, or vividness, of visual mental images self-reported by human observers reflects the intensive variation in subjective time duration during the process of generation of said mental imagery. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a biologically plausible essential multilayer perceptron (MLP) architecture can validly map the phenomenological categories of subjective time duration onto levels of subjectively self-reported vividness. A secondary objective was to explore whether this type of neural network cognitive modeling approach can give insight into plausible underlying large-scale brain dynamics. To achieve these objectives, vividness self-reports and reaction times from a previously collected database were reanalyzed using multilayered perceptron network models. The input layer consisted of six levels representing vividness self-reports and a reaction time cofactor. A single hidden layer consisted of three nodes representing the salience, task positive, and default mode networks. The output layer consisted of five levels representing Vittorio Benussi’s subjective time categories. Across different models of networks, Benussi’s subjective time categories (Level 1 = very brief, 2 = brief, 3 = present, 4 = long, 5 = very long) were predicted by visual imagery vividness level 1 (=no image) to 5 (=very vivid) with over 90% success in classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This accuracy level was maintained after 5-fold cross validation. Linear regressions, Welch’s t-test for independent coefficients, and Pearson’s correlation analysis were applied to the resulting hidden node weight vectors, obtaining evidence for strong correlation and anticorrelation between nodes. This study successfully mapped Benussi’s five levels of subjective time categories onto the activation patterns of a simple MLP, providing a novel computational framework for experimental phenomenology. Our results revealed structured, complex dynamics between the task positive network (TPN), the default mode network (DMN), and the salience network (SN), suggesting that the neural mechanisms underlying temporal consciousness involve flexible network interactions beyond the traditional triple network model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it