Multilayer Perceptron Mapping of Subjective Time Duration onto Mental Imagery Vividness and Underlying Brain Dynamics: A Neural Cognitive Modeling Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to a recent experimental phenomenology–information processing theory, the sensory strength, or vividness, of visual mental images self-reported by human observers reflects the intensive variation in subjective time duration during the process of generation of said mental imagery. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a biologically plausible essential multilayer perceptron (MLP) architecture can validly map the phenomenological categories of subjective time duration onto levels of subjectively self-reported vividness. A secondary objective was to explore whether this type of neural network cognitive modeling approach can give insight into plausible underlying large-scale brain dynamics. To achieve these objectives, vividness self-reports and reaction times from a previously collected database were reanalyzed using multilayered perceptron network models. The input layer consisted of six levels representing vividness self-reports and a reaction time cofactor. A single hidden layer consisted of three nodes representing the salience, task positive, and default mode networks. The output layer consisted of five levels representing Vittorio Benussi’s subjective time categories. Across different models of networks, Benussi’s subjective time categories (Level 1 = very brief, 2 = brief, 3 = present, 4 = long, 5 = very long) were predicted by visual imagery vividness level 1 (=no image) to 5 (=very vivid) with over 90% success in classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This accuracy level was maintained after 5-fold cross validation. Linear regressions, Welch’s t-test for independent coefficients, and Pearson’s correlation analysis were applied to the resulting hidden node weight vectors, obtaining evidence for strong correlation and anticorrelation between nodes. This study successfully mapped Benussi’s five levels of subjective time categories onto the activation patterns of a simple MLP, providing a novel computational framework for experimental phenomenology. Our results revealed structured, complex dynamics between the task positive network (TPN), the default mode network (DMN), and the salience network (SN), suggesting that the neural mechanisms underlying temporal consciousness involve flexible network interactions beyond the traditional triple network model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".