MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413162450 · doi:10.1016/j.tws.2025.113791

Comparative experimental study on the serviceability and flexural strength of cold-formed steel I-joists with and without stiffened web holes

2025· article· en· W4413162450 on OpenAlex
Quzzafi Rehman, Khaled Sennah, Amr A. Nassr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThin-Walled Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Flexural strengthStructural engineeringCold-formed steelMaterials scienceComposite materialCold formingEngineeringBuckling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a bstract Cold-Formed Steel (CFS) has emerged as a preferred material for low-rise building construction, as well as for roof and floor systems, due to its favorable performance, cost efficiency, safety, and sustainability attributes. However, the structural and economic advantages of CFS floor systems can be undermined by vibration serviceability challenges if not appropriately addressed in the design phase. Furthermore, utility holes, such as slotted or circular openings in the web of CFS joists, are commonly introduced to accommodate piping, plumbing, or electrical wiring. These holes, while functional, may also affect the serviceability of the floor system by altering its dynamic response and structural integrity. Existing design methodologies for calculating the dynamic properties of floor systems have been primarily developed for light-frame CFS, structural steel, and concrete floor systems. The applicability of these methods to I-shaped CFS joists, particularly those with utility holes, remains unexplored. Furthermore, the North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members (CSA-S136–16) provides design specifications for C-shaped joists at ultimate limit states but lacks provisions for I-shaped joists or edge-stiffened (lipped) holes. As such, an experimental study on CFS I-shape joists is needed to obtain experimental data to evaluate the available ultimate strength equations and serviceability design procedure when applied to such joist type with utility holes. This paper presents the experimental investigation of CFS I-shape members with web holes with edge stiffening to study the effect of stiffened holes on the serviceability and flexural strength of the member when subjected to flexural loading. Additionally, the study assessed the accuracy and applicability of existing design methods in predicting key dynamic and static performance metrics, including fundamental frequency, static deflection, and acceleration responses to walking-induced excitation. The findings contribute to the advancement of design practices for CFS floor systems, particularly those employing I-shaped members with utility holes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it