СТЕПАН ЯРМУСЬ – МИСЛИТЕЛЬ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ ПРАВОСЛАВНОЇ ДІАСПОРИ. До сторічного ювілею
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is a tribute to the memory of Ukrainian scholars of religion to the famous Ukrainian theologian, church and public figure from Canada, professor and priest Stepan Yarmus, who turned 100 in May 2025. The presented biography briefly describes the life path of an outstanding Ukrainian, determines his contribution to the establishment and development of Ukrainian Orthodoxy. The article emphasizes that long-term residence abroad did not change the worldview and faith of Father Stepan Yarmus. He remained a Ukrainian and an Orthodox Christian. Holding prominent positions in the Ukrainian Greek Orthodox Church (UGOC), the father in every way contributed to the preservation of its national face, the Ukrainian Orthodox tradition. The printed works of the father-doctor, which are partially analyzed in the article, are an example of living Ukrainian theological thought, which is currently experiencing a new period of its revival. With the emergence of the Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate, the professor-theologian joined the ranks of those who supported its formation and development, became a professor at its Theological Academy and an honorary employee of the Department of Religious Studies of the G.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the NAS of Ukraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".