MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413167810 · doi:10.53555/vmr2cc72

Potential Aquaculture Practices In Saline Waterlogged Land Using Geospatial Approach Rohtak District (Haryana)

2022· article· en· W4413167810 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Dinesh Kumar, Chander Shekhar, Sandeep Kumar, Banti Banti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFisheries and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquacultureGeospatial analysisFisheryGeographyWater resource managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>Remote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For farmers whose agricultural land had been waterlogged and therefore unusable for years, there is some good news. Currently, the state administration is working to turn the flooded fields into ponds that can be used for fish aquaculture. In order to replace the "Green Revolution" with the "Blue Revolution,” The study focuses on the waterlogging issues and aquaculture potential in Rohtak district, Haryana, India, utilizing spatial and non-spatial data. Rohtak district spans 1,745 square kilometers, representing 3.9% of Haryana's total area. With average annual rainfall of 592 mm, the region experiences significant waterlogging, especially during the southwest monsoon season. Landsat-8 satellite imagery from 2022 was analyzed using unsupervised classification and the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) to identify waterlogged areas. The depth of the water table and salinity levels (EC values) were also assessed using groundwater data. Results indicate that 42,229.4 hectares are severely waterlogged, while 82,693.8 hectares have salinity levels slightly unfavorable for aquaculture. Based on water depth, 12,061.7 hectares have excellent aquaculture potential, whereas 54.1% of the district is only slightly suitable for aquaculture. This study provides insights into water management challenges and opportunities for aquaculture development in the district.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicFisheries and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207