MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413167880 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.198

Adaptive Optimal Control of Lettuce Growth in Greenhouses Using Sensitivity-Driven Measurement Collection

2025· article· en· W4413167880 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrik Valábek, Jozef Vargan, Radoslav Paulen

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean CommissionSt. Thomas University
KeywordsGreenhouseSensitivity (control systems)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)Environmental scienceAgricultural engineeringMathematicsHorticultureComputer scienceBiologyEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel workflow for the design of an adaptive model-based controller to optimize the time and energy consumption for plant cultivation combined with online analysis and estimation of model parameters based on scarce data. A non-linear model of lettuce growth is subject to sensitivity analysis of selected parameters to determine the Effective sequence and time horizon of infrequent data sampling of plant physiological properties. In the designed measurement campaign, the parameter estimation is performed to update the model parameter space, improving the accuracy of plant growth predictions and control efficiency. The implementation of run-time-updated model in a predictive control framework leads to minimization of the energy-related cost and the full-growth time of the plant. Simulations show promising results in minimizing the time required to the desired plant yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207