MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413169148 · doi:10.3390/hearts6030022

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiac MRI T1 and ECV Measurements in Pre-Heart Failure Populations

2025· article· en· W4413169148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert S. Doyle, Ross Walsh, Jamie Walsh, Hugo C. Temperley, John McCormick, Gerard Giblin

Bibliographic record

VenueHearts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart failureMeta-analysisCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) often develops from a prolonged asymptomatic phase where early detection could prevent progression. Pre-heart failure (pre-HF) populations—those with risk factors (Stage A) or subclinical myocardial changes (Stage B)—are critical for intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping offers a non-invasive approach to detect early myocardial changes in these groups. This systematic review evaluates the role of T1 and ECV mapping in pre-HF populations, focusing on their diagnostic and prognostic utility. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane was conducted up to April 2025, identifying 17 studies that met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted directly into Excel, and methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and cross-sectional studies and AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) to compare T1 and ECV values between pre-HF and control groups. Results: Studies consistently reported elevated T1 (989.6–1415.41 milliseconds) and ECV (25.7–42.81%) in pre-HF groups compared to controls (T1: 967–1310.63 ms, ECV: 23.5–29.9%). Meta-analysis showed a significant increase in T1 (MD: 27.62 ms, 95% CI: 8.04–47.19, p < 0.006) and ECV (MD: 2.97%, 95% CI: 1.88–4.06, p < 0.00001) in pre-HF groups. RQS scores ranged from 17.2% to 77.8% (mean: 37.9%), and NOS scores ranged from 5 to 8 (mean: 6.2), reflecting variability in study quality. The AMSTAR-2 rating for the systematic review was moderate. Conclusions: T1 and ECV mapping enhance CMR-based detection of early myocardial changes in pre-HF, offering a promising non-invasive approach to predict HF risk. However, variability in study quality, small sample sizes, and methodological inconsistencies limit generalisability. Future research should focus on standardised protocols, prospective designs, and multi-center studies to integrate these techniques into clinical practice, potentially guiding preventive therapies such as SGLT2is and tafamidis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartsSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207