MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413170945 · doi:10.15408/harkat.v21i1.34973

KAJIAN GENDER TENTANG DUNIA PENDIDIKAN DI MEDIA SOSIAL: PENELITIAN BIBLIOMETRIK BERBASIS DATA SCOPUS

2025· article· en· W4413170945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad Bahtiar, Syihaabul Hudaa

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Harkat Media Komunikasi Gender · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEducation Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusSociologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The rapid development of social media has influenced various aspects of life, including education and gender construction. These issues have become increasingly complex in line with the growing use of digital media, thus requiring comprehensive scientific mapping. This study aims to map research trends on the theme of gender–education–social media based on metadata from articles indexed in the Scopus database during the period 1995–2023. The novelty of this research lies in its bibliometric approach to analyzing the evolution of keywords, author collaboration, and publication trends both thematically and spatially over a long time span. The data were analyzed using biblioshiny based on RStudio, following these steps: (1) searching for articles using specific keywords, (2) collecting metadata in Excel format, (3) processing the data through biblioshiny, and (4) conducting a descriptive bibliometric analysis. The scope of analysis includes the number of publications, author productivity, international collaboration networks, as well as thematic mapping and keyword evolution. This study is limited to metadata analysis without full-text content review and focuses only on articles available in the Scopus database. The results indicate that female authors dominate publications related to gender issues in Scopus. The most frequent collaborations occurred between authors from the USA–UK, USA–New Zealand, and USA–Canada. This mapping identifies emerging, stagnant, and potentially expandable themes. The study contributes to identifying research gaps and may serve as a foundation for further studies that explore the intersection of gender, education, and social media in more contextual and interdisciplinary ways. Abstrak. Perkembangan pesat media sosial telah memengaruhi berbagai aspek kehidupan, termasuk dunia pendidikan dan konstruksi gender. Isu-isu ini semakin kompleks seiring meningkatnya penggunaan media digital, sehingga memerlukan pemetaan ilmiah yang komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tren riset bertema gender–pendidikan–media sosial berdasarkan metadata artikel yang terindeks dalam database Scopus selama periode 1995–2023. Kebaruan (novelty) dari riset ini terletak pada pendekatan bibliometrik dalam menganalisis evolusi kata kunci, kolaborasi penulis, dan tren publikasi secara tematik dan spasial dalam rentang waktu panjang. Data dianalisis menggunakan biblioshiny berbasis RStudio, dengan tahap: (1) pencarian artikel sesuai kata kunci, (2) pengumpulan metadata dalam format Excel, (3) pemrosesan data melalui biblioshiny, dan (4) analisis deskriptif bibliometrik. Ruang lingkup analisis mencakup jumlah publikasi, produktivitas penulis, jaringan kolaborasi antarnegara, serta peta tematik dan evolusi kata kunci. Batasan penelitian ini adalah tidak dilakukannya telaah isi penuh artikel serta keterbatasan pada artikel yang tersedia di database Scopus. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penulis perempuan mendominasi publikasi terkait isu gender di Scopus. Kolaborasi paling sering terjadi antara penulis dari USA–UK, USA–New Zealand, dan USA–Canada. Pemetaan ini mengidentifikasi tema-tema yang berkembang, stagnan, dan potensial untuk digali lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi dalam mengidentifikasi celah riset (research gap) serta dapat menjadi dasar untuk pengembangan studi lanjut yang mengkaji hubungan antara gender, pendidikan, dan media sosial secara lebih kontekstual dan lintas disiplin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Harkat Media Komunikasi GenderSame topicEducation Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207