Identification of hub genes and prediction of the ceRNA network in adult sepsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Sepsis refers to a dysregulated host immune response to infection. It carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, and its pathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. The main aim of this study was to identify prognostic hub genes for sepsis and to predict a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network that regulates the hub genes. Methods Six transcriptome datasets from the peripheral blood of septic patients were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The robust rank aggregation (RRA) method was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across these datasets. A comprehensive bioinformatics investigation was conducted, encompassing Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses using the “clusterProfiler” package in R, as well as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to further elucidate the biological functions and pathways associated with the DEGs. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify a module significantly associated with sepsis. Integration of this module with protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis facilitated the identification of five hub genes. These hub genes were subsequently validated using an independent dataset and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of peripheral blood samples from septic patients. The prognostic values of these hub genes were assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Finally, a ceRNA network regulating the prognostic hub genes was constructed by integrating data from a literature review as well as five online databases. Results RRA analysis identified 164 DEGs across six training cohorts. Bioinformatics analyses revealed concurrent hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in sepsis patients. Five hub genes were identified via WGCNA and PPI network analysis, and their differential expression was verified by the validation dataset ( GSE28750 ) and RT-qPCR analysis in the peripheral blood of septic patients. ROC analysis confirmed four hub genes with prognostic value, and a ceRNA network was predicted to elucidate their regulatory mechanisms. Conclusion This study identified four hub genes (CLEC4D, GPR84, S100A12, and HK3) with significant prognostic value in sepsis and predicted a ceRNA network (NEAT1-hsa-miR-495-3p-ELF1) regulating their expression. The integrated analysis reconfirmed the concurrent presence of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in hospitalized sepsis patients. These findings enhance the understanding of sepsis pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".