MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413177971 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555179

Spatially resolved [CII]–gas conversion factor in early galaxies

2025· article· en· W4413177971 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. Vallini, A. Pallottini, M. Kohandel, Laura Sommovigo, Andrea Ferrara, M. Béthermin, Rodrigo Herrera-Camus, Stefano Carniani, Andreas L. Faisst, Anita Zanella, F. Pozzi, M. Dessauges‐Zavadsky, C. Gruppioni, E. Veraldi, C. Accard

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsAgenzia Spaziale Italiana
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. Determining how efficiently gas collapses into stars at high redshifts is key to understanding galaxy evolution in the epoch of reionization (EoR). Globally, this process is quantified by the gas depletion time (tdep); on resolved scales, it is quantified by the slope and normalization of the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relation. This work explores the global (α[CII]) and spatially resolved (W[CII]) [CII]-to-gas conversion factors at high-z and their use when inferring gas masses, surface densities, and tdep in the EoR. Methods. We selected galaxies at 4 < z < 9 from the SERRA cosmological zoom-in simulation, which features on-the-fly radiative transfer and resolves interstellar medium properties down to ≈30 pc. The [CII] emission modeling from photodissociation regions allows us to derive the global α[CII] and maps of W[CII]. We study their dependence on gas metallicity (Z), density (n), Mach number (ℳ), and burstiness parameter (κs), and provide best-fit relations. Results. The α[CII] decreases with increasing Z and galaxy compactness, while the resolved W[CII] shows two regimes: at Z < 0.2 Z⊙, it anticorrelates with n and Z but not with κs; above this threshold, it also depends on κs, with burstier regions having lower conversion factors. This implies W[CII] ∝ Σ[CII]−0.5, as dense, metal-rich, and bursty regions exhibit higher [CII] surface brightnesses. Applying a constant α[CII] leads to an overestimation of Σgas in bright Σ[CII] patches; this in turn flattens the KS slope and leads to overestimations of tdep by up to a factor of 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→