MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data Classification Using Sardine Optimized Adversarial Generative Quaternion Network with Fibonacci Q-Matrix Hyperchaotic Encryption Schemes in Cloud

2025· article· en· W4413178412 on OpenAlexaff
Kooragayala Sukeerthi, R. Kesavan, S. A. Kalaiselvan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSardineFibonacci numberEncryptionComputer scienceQuaternionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematicsComputer networkDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of cloud computing sensitive information management requires data classification to function securely across all industries. A protected framework for cloud-based data analytics with privacy preservation emerges through integrating sophisticated encryption techniques with neural networks. The need to protect data grows increasingly critical because organizations must specify precise performance measures as well as classification accuracy metrics. The developing thrilling cybersecurity and cloud data disclosure world continues to inspire many trailblazing privacy protection solutions that leap forward unimpeded. The research proposes and builds a new framework called AS-FiQ-AgQN, which fuses adaptive optimization with advanced encryption and secure classification. The framework secures data confidentiality by employing Fibonacci Q-Matrix Hyperchaotic Encryption. Data classification on the encrypted data is performed using Adversarial generative Quaternion Network which is further optimized using Adaptive Sardine Optimization for better performance of the network. Performances have proven to yield astonishing results, with accuracy above 99.5 %, precision of 99.3 %, and recall above 99.7 %, which affirms the efficiency with which the system operates. Through these evaluations researchers confirm the framework's success in both precise data categorization while ensuring encryption safety at the cloud level. Data classification based on AS-FiQ-AgQN produces a robust secure system to protect privacy that enables accurate predictive cloud analytics with reliable data protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionFrench-language works237,207