MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413180222 · doi:10.1123/ijsc.2025-0112

“Criminals” and “Killjoys”: An Exploratory News Media Mapping of the Environment-Security Politics at the Olympics

2025· article· en· W4413180222 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Ehsan Ali, MacIntosh Ross, Jay Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sport Communication · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceNews mediaMedia studiesAdvertisingSociologyBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 4 decades, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has increasingly foregrounded environmental issues in the staging of Olympic Games and selection of host cities. At the same time, critiques of the IOC’s environmental turn point to the unsustainable legacy of the Games and demonstrate the failure of host cities to meet their environmental goals. Research has also revealed the rapid expansion of a surveillance and security infrastructure surrounding the Olympics. Such developments demonstrate how the environmental and security arms of the IOC, seemingly disparate, may share a synergistic relationship that serves the interest of the IOC and its partners and that attempts to silence environmental activists. Thus, the objective of this paper was to identify and map news media coverage of this relationship over the modern Olympic Games. To address this objective, we asked the following research questions: What connection exists within news media coverage of environmental approaches and Olympic-based security and surveillance? And what does this coverage reveal about the relationship between the IOC, its partners, and environmental activists? Our mapping of these trends begins with the Sydney 2000 Summer Games and ends with the lead-up to the Paris 2024 Games. Our analysis of the news media corpus illuminates the connections between the IOC’s approach to the environment and the interests of its public and private partners, including host cities and nations, corporate sponsors, and construction firms. This mutually beneficial alignment is protected through the development of an extensive security and surveillance apparatus around the Olympics that suppresses activists and others advocating for alternative forms of environmentalism. The IOC’s oppressive tactics are enabled, in part, by the dominant characterization of environmental activists as criminals, killjoys, and antithetical to Olympism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0110.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sport CommunicationSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207