MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413183986 · doi:10.1093/scipol/scaf034

Stockholm science: the syndrome, not the city!!!

2025· article· en· W4413183986 on OpenAlex
Sávio Torres de Farías

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of scientific knowledge is crucial for the modernization of society, but the way this knowledge is disseminated also has a significant impact. Since the creation of the first scientific societies and journals, the traditional publishing model has been largely dominated by publishers, restricting access to scientific findings. The open-access model, introduced in the 1990s, initially aimed to democratize access but has gradually transformed into a profitable system based on article processing charges, creating a cycle of exclusion. Scientists, especially young ones or those from underfunded groups, face significant financial barriers to publishing in prestigious journals. The dependence on these models is creating hierarchical divisions in science, leading to a system that, despite its democratic origins, perpetuates inequalities and limits innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.100
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.166
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1000.166
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0650.540
Science and technology studies0.0060.015
Scholarly communication0.0200.003
Open science0.0130.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.510
GPT teacher head0.600
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it