MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413187009 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2025-0129

A practical design method for energy piles incorporating thermal–mechanical soil–structure interaction

2025· article· en· W4413187009 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tuan A. Pham, Farshid Vahedifard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringSettlement (finance)Soil structure interactionStructural engineeringPileGeologyEngineeringCivil engineeringForensic engineeringComputer scienceFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy piles are a dual-purpose geostructure system designed to serve both as load-bearing foundations and as a means of utilizing geothermal energy for heating and cooling buildings. Due to their dual function, the behavior of energy piles under temperature variation at the pile–soil interface is significantly more complex than that of traditional piles. This study proposes a unified method for predicting the load–settlement behavior of traditional and energy piles, formulated through a cubic equation that integrates end-bearing hardening, skin-friction softening, and a modified effective stress theory accounting for particle contact area evolution. Unlike existing approaches, the proposed method uniquely separates end-bearing and skin-friction resistances and captures the coupled thermal-mechanical effects at the soil–pile interface, including both resistance gains and losses due to heating or cooling. Validation against interface shear tests and full-scale field measurements confirms the accuracy and robustness of the proposed method. Results show that the proposed framework significantly improves load–settlement predictions and provides a physically consistent and practical tool for energy pile design under varying thermal and mechanical loads. The findings also highlight that temperature effects on energy pile resistance vary with soil conditions. Heating can increase resistance via pile expansion, radial thermal stress, higher particle contact, and friction angle. Conversely, it may reduce resistance due to thermally induced excess pore-water pressure, lower overconsolidation, total stress reduction, decreased stiffness, and cohesion loss. These opposing mechanisms highlight the complex, site-specific thermomechanical behavior of energy piles. Considering microstructural evolution and thermal-softening effects is necessary to enhance the predictive capabilities for pile performance in complex operational environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207