Feasibility, Usability, and Effects of Leisure-Based Cognitive Training Using a Fully Immersive Virtual Reality System in Older Adults: Single-Arm Pretest-Posttest Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cognitive training is an effective approach to support cognitive function in older adults. Incorporating meaningful leisure activities, such as gardening, may enhance both engagement and training outcomes. While fully immersive virtual reality (VR) offers ecologically valid and engaging environments that can further boost motivation, limited research has explored the combination of VR-based cognitive training and leisure activities for older adults. Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility, usability, and preliminary effectiveness of leisure-based VR cognitive training for community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A fully immersive VR cognitive training system, controlled via a head-mounted display, was developed, incorporating gardening-themed activities such as planting, fertilizing, watering, and harvesting. These tasks were designed to engage multiple cognitive domains, including memory, attention, executive function, processing speed, and visuospatial abilities. The program consisted of 16 sessions delivered over 8 weeks (twice weekly, 1 hour per session). Cognitive outcomes were assessed before and after training using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the digit symbol substitution test, word list immediate and delayed recall, spatial span, and the Stroop Color and Word Test. Feasibility, acceptance, and usability were evaluated using the System Usability Scale and a posttraining questionnaire. Licensed occupational therapists from both community and institutional settings assessed the training system's usability. Results: All 41 participants (mean age 69.79, SD 5.05 y) completed the training with 100% adherence and no serious adverse events. Feasibility ratings-particularly for perceived usefulness, intention to use, and subjective norms-reflected strong acceptance. Usability ratings from older adults indicated high ease of use, enjoyment, and positive experience, while professionals rated the system as moderately usable (mean System Usability Scale score 68.01, SD 8.38). Statistically significant improvements were observed in general cognition (P=.004), processing speed (P=.049), immediate and delayed memory (P<.001), and executive function (P=.002). No significant changes were found in visuospatial memory (P=.29). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility and usability of a gardening-based VR cognitive training program for older adults. Feasibility was demonstrated through full adherence, absence of major adverse events, and high participant acceptance. Usability feedback was favorable from both older adults and professionals across community and long term care settings. Additionally, improvements in multiple cognitive domains, including general cognition, processing speed, memory, and executive function, suggest potential cognitive benefits. Future randomized controlled trials with more diverse samples and extended follow-up are warranted to confirm and expand upon these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".