MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413188246 · doi:10.1111/apce.12476

Issue Information

2025· paratext· en· W4413188246 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics · 2025
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual PaulistaWageningen University and ResearchPontificia Universidad JaverianaUniversité Lille 1 - Sciences et TechnologiesUniversidad de ZaragozaSzegedi TudományegyetemUniversità degli Studi di SienaToyo UniversityUniversidad de CantabriaTallinna TehnikaülikoolUniversidade do MinhoUniversité Paris DiderotYale UniversityConcordia UniversityUniversité de ToulouseBrown UniversityUniversity of MissouriUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of LeedsUniversité de LiègeFundação Getulio VargasGeorge Washington UniversityUniversité de LilleLondon School of Economics and Political Science
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Annales de l'conomie publique, sociale et cooprative Mapping the relevance and influence of gender in social economy enterprises: A review based on bibliographic analysis EsthEr GArcA-ro, FrAncisco rincon-roldAn and PEdro BAEnA-lunA unveiling the role of government support: Empirical studies on the performance of cooperatives in Vietnam An thi thuy duonG Gender blindness in the 'next Generation European union' funds: Projects for Economic recovery and transformation social economy as an exception to the rule MArA BAstidA, MiGuEl . VzquEz tAn, AlBErto VAquEro GArcA and MArA luisA dEl ro ArAjo towards sustainable climate-smart agriculture: A cost-benefit analysis of a modernized irrigation district in spain nicolA coMincioli, cristinA El Khoury, dAVidE BAzzAnA, dEMis lEGrEnzi, FErnAndo nArdi, dAniEl A. sEGoViA-cArdozo, sErGio VErGAlli and lEonor rodrGuEz-sinoBAs What factors influence the vertical integration of agricultural cooperatives?-Evidencefrom 500 cooperatives in heilongjiang, china yuxin liu, lihAn cAo, runqi Guo and EryAnG liu the economic potential of home sharing cooperatives for active ageing of older people cArlos rosA-jiMnEz, ruBn MorA-EstEBAn, GErMn ortEGA-PAloMo and juAn MArcos cAstro-BonAo instant lottery innovation, tax compliance and herd effects, an impact assessment in Brazil jorGE luis tonEtto, AdElAr FochEzAtto, josEP MiquEl PiquE and cArinA rAPEtti unveiling the potential of community financing for entrepreneurs: A systematic review and research agenda sAMAnWitA MishrA and chAndAn KuMAr sAhoo

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Public and Cooperative EconomicsSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207