MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413190857 · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2025.104440

Waste to emerging and sustainable wealth: An integrated mining 4.0-recycling 4.0-decision making 4.0 framework overcoming greener red mud recycling technologies promotion

2025· article· en· W4413190857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Technology & Innovation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsIron Ore Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)BusinessWaste recyclingWaste managementEnvironmental economicsSustainable developmentEnvironmental planningEngineeringEnvironmental scienceEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a comprehensive, three-phase framework for selecting an optimal technological solution for repurposing Red Mud (RM) based on a green mining approach. The framework introduces a novel ZE-FSIWEC method in Phase 1 for Mining 4.0 criteria weighting. In Phase 2, Fuzzy-Delphi method (FDM) screens key Recycling 4.0 alternatives, followed by a combination of eight multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods including ARLON (2024), RAWEC (2024), MARA (2022), COBRA (2022), RAFSI, MAIRCA, MABAC, and ARAS for ranking. To address uncertainties, enhance decision reliability, and improve group decision credibility, fuzzy ZE-numbers are merged with Decision-Making 4.0 methods, which are then consolidated using Borda-count and Copeland ranking for a robust assessment. Iran was chosen as the analysis subject, with Phase 1 evaluating the national participants' perspectives, and Phase 2 focusing on the local site participants' viewpoints. In the final phase, the framework culminates in the development of a quantifiable RM Management Sustainability Score (RMMSS) to identify the most suitable strategic supply planning of RM residues among different Recycling 4.0 technologies and enhance mining waste management standards. Therefore, the proposed tech-paradigm based framework demonstrates its efficiency in a scenario where mining enterprises aim to market their RM. Sensitivity analysis shows the reliability of ZE-FSIWEC-ZE-RAWEC method, with a Spearman's correlation over 86.9 %, making it promising for future research. The Jajarm alumina complex case study showcases the framework's remarkable impact. This framework demonstrates its practicality and region-independent adaptability, contributing to a greener future by promoting sustainable practices and transforming hazardous RM waste into valuable assets. • Evaluating 15 different Recycling 4.0 technologies ranks for cleaner RM consumption. • Determining 18 various Mining 4.0 criteria weights using a hybrid ZE-FSIWEC method. • Embedding Decision-Making 4.0 across all framework phases considering uncertainty-reliability-group decision credibility. • Introducing a quantifiable RMMSS and certifications for greener mining waste management. • Consolidating 8 ZE-MCDMs using Borda-count & Copeland ranking for optimal RM utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it