MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413196957 · doi:10.1080/0145935x.2025.2541601

Indigenous Youth in the Canadian Child Welfare System in the Context of Trauma: A Human Ecological Perspective

2025· article· en· W4413196957 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shiva Kiaras, Pushpanjali Dashora

Bibliographic record

VenueChild & Youth Services · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPerspective (graphical)WelfareContext (archaeology)EcologySociologyPsychologyCriminologyPolitical scienceGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overrepresentation of Indigenous children and youth in the Canadian Child Welfare System (CWS) is a well-documented topic in research. Current research focuses on individual factors of trauma for Indigenous youth in the CWS. Through a human ecological framework, this study discusses the experiences of trauma among Indigenous youth in the CWS and relationships between early traumatic experiences in the CWS on youth’s well-being. Findings show that trauma experienced within systems surrounding youth during their experience in the CWS significantly impact their well-being. In response, impactful changes at policy level are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild & Youth ServicesSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207