Intraurethral Steroid and Clean Intermittent Self-Dilatation for Lichen Sclerosus Proven Urethral Stricture Disease—A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lichen sclerosus is a chronic lymphocyte-mediated inflammatory disorder with a predilection for the anogenital region. It is a common cause of urethral stricture disease in males. The gold standard treatment is considered to be surgical reconstruction; however, there are many patients who are not suitable or not willing to undergo surgery. Cutaneous lichen sclerosus restricted to the foreskin, prepuce or glans is often response to topical corticosteroids; however, the use of intraurethral corticosteroids for urethral involvement has limited research. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 18 patients with histologically confirmed lichen sclerosus and associated urethral stricture disease. They were treated with clean intermittent self catheterisation using a hydrophilic catheter coated with 0.05% betamethasone ointment. International Prostate Symptom Score with Quality of Life scores were measured prior to treatment and at follow-up intervals. Results: There was significant improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life scores at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months, with only 1 patient ceasing treatment due to intolerance. One patient required a single repeat endoscopic dilatation following a period of non-compliance with treatment. Conclusions: Intraurethral corticosteroids with clean-intermittent self-catheterisation is effective and well tolerated for treating lichen sclerosus-associated urethral stricture disease in the short to intermediate term for patients not willing to undergo urethroplasty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".