MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modernization of trade union activities from the perspective of the human rights function of trade unions: international experience

2025· article· en· W4413198811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu. V. Striiskyi

Bibliographic record

VenueUzhhorod National University Herald Series Law · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrade unionModernization theoryCollective bargainingGrassrootsContext (archaeology)EconomicsPolitical scienceInternational tradeEconomic growthLabour economicsLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes contemporary challenges and perspectives on the modernization of trade union activities through the integration of the human rights concept into their protective functions. The study examines how recent economic changes, characterized by the deregulation of labor relations, the spread of non-standard employment forms, and the privatization of social risks, have significantly weakened traditional mechanisms of worker protection. In this context, trade unions face the necessity to reconsider their roles and operational strategies, as classical instruments of collective bargaining and centralized regulation of labor relations have lost some of their effectiveness. The analysis is based on the international experience of countries with varying models of trade union organization, such as the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Scandinavian countries, and Canada. The article explores three primary models of trade union activity: representative, service-oriented, and organizing. The representative model involves delegating the protection of workers’ interests to professional union representatives through formal negotiation processes at enterprise and sectoral levels. The service-oriented model focuses on providing union members with diverse services, including legal protection and consultations, yet this model may foster passivity among workers. Conversely, the organizing model activates grassroots structures by engaging workers in self-organization and collective actions to defend their rights through mass campaigns and social movements. Additionally, the article emphasizes the importance of trade unions adapting to new employment forms, specifically engaging workers in the gig economy, migrant laborers, and other vulnerable groups traditionally excluded from union protections. Particular attention is devoted to successful examples of trade union modernization in the United States and Europe, where the organizing model has halted declines in union membership and enhanced the protection of labor rights. Thus, the article offers both theoretical and practical justification for transitioning trade unions from narrow forms of representation toward broader human rights organizations capable of effectively addressing contemporary socio-economic challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.019
Scholarly communication0.0090.011
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUzhhorod National University Herald Series LawSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207