MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Legal support for the development of ecological tourism in Ukraine: current state and prospects

2025· article· en· W4413198994 on OpenAlex
V. L. Ostropolskyi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUzhhorod National University Herald Series Law · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismEcotourismNatural resourceSustainable developmentPolitical scienceRecreationTourism geographyEnvironmental planningBusinessEnvironmental resource managementLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article addresses the pressing issues surrounding the development of ecological tourism as a relatively new yet rapidly growing sector of the tourism industry, which gained global recognition following the adoption of the Quebec Declaration in 2002. The core theoretical foundations of ecotourism are defined, beginning with the first conceptualization by Héctor Ceballos-Lascuráin, which emphasizes its goal of preserving natural and cultural heritage. Particular attention is paid to Ukraine’s potential for ecotourism development, which stems from its favorable geographical location, rich natural and recreational resources, unique landscapes, deep-rooted traditions of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, and a well-developed network of protected areas. The article analyzes the legal framework for tourism activities in Ukraine, especially under martial law, taking into account the roles of the Verkhovna Rada, the Cabinet of Ministers, central and local executive authorities, and military administrations. The importance of the Law of Ukraine “On Tourism” and other regulatory acts in ensuring licensing, standardization, and certification of tourism services is discussed. The role of tourism as a tool for environmental education, personal development, and fostering civic responsibility is also explored. The impact of the full-scale war on Ukraine’s tourism industry is examined, revealing major losses due to active hostilities, infrastructure destruction, closed airspace, and disrupted logistics. The adaptation of domestic tourism and the repurposing of tourism infrastructure to meet the needs of internally displaced persons are highlighted. The article underscores the necessity for environmentally responsible ecotourism development in Ukraine, advocating for systematic approaches that include the implementation of environmental policies for tourism businesses, biodiversity conservation, visitor education, pollution minimization, and sustainable resource management. It is concluded that ecotourism can serve as an effective tool for the preservation of natural areas, the promotion of sustainable development, the improvement of the national economy, and the strengthening of Ukraine’s international standing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it