Diagnosing Blastomycosis: A Review of Laboratory Methods and Clinical Utility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
genus, is endemic to regions in North America, including the Great Lakes and other parts of Canada and the United States of America. The infection primarily occurs through the inhalation of airborne conidia from contaminated soil and decaying organic matter. Pulmonary involvement is most common, but dissemination to other organs such as the skin and bones can occur, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Diagnosis is challenging due to its clinical overlap with other diseases. Culture remains the gold-standard diagnostic method, but is time-consuming, with sensitivity ranging from 66.4% to 86%. Tissue histopathology offers quicker results but has sensitivities ranging from 36% to 85%. Antigen detection assays show high sensitivity from 76.3% to 91.3% but suffer from cross-reactivity with other fungi. PCR methods offer high specificity, with sensitivity ranging from 67.6% to 100%. In immunocompromised patients, blastomycosis is often more severe, with a mortality rate exceeding 30%. Multi-modal diagnostic approaches are crucial for accurate detection and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".