MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413199340 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18080446

Investigation of the Antecedents of Digital Transformation and Their Effects on Operational Performance in the Jordanian Manufacturing Sector

2025· article· en· W4413199340 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hussein D. Al-Majali, Nawaf Samah Mohammad Thuneibat, Nour Qatawneh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital transformationBusinessOperational efficiencyAntecedent (behavioral psychology)RevenueProcess managementMarketingValue (mathematics)Manufacturing sectorIndustrial organizationKnowledge managementComputer scienceAccountingEconomicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digitalization is viewed as an important promoter of competitiveness, offering future avenues to new value and revenue opportunities. Nevertheless, the factors that determine the drivers of digital transformation (DT) adoption still need to be explored and understood further. Based on the RBV and institutional theory, this study examines the roles played by organizational culture, IT readiness, and customer demands of firms in the implementation of DT and the consequent improvement of operational performance. The results of a survey carried out among 226 manufacturing companies in Jordan indicate that these antecedent factors have a significant and positive effect on the adoption of DT and operational performance. The results also demonstrate that the implementation of DT enhances the operational performance of firms by increasing their efficiency and effectiveness. This research adds to the existing literature on digital transformation through an examination of the antecedents of its adoption. These findings are useful, as they assist firms in viewing digital transformation as an overarching opportunity that needs to be leveraged to improve their operational performance and competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207