MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413201485 · doi:10.1177/01171968251351043

From doing essential work to social good: Filipino racialized labor and social agency during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada

2025· article· en· W4413201485 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Glenda Tibe Bonifacio

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian and Pacific migration journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsPandemicAgency (philosophy)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Work (physics)SociologyPolitical scienceEconomic growth2019-20 coronavirus outbreakGender studiesSocial scienceVirologyEconomicsMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Filipino (im)migrant workers are highly represented in essential sectors in Canada. They contribute to society but experience racism, more so during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using interpretive phenomenology from their narratives, I posit a rethinking of essential work beyond its labor value and recognize embodied complexities and intersections of Filipino lives in Alberta. Doing essential work creates social good based on their demonstrations of social agency, from volunteering to creating alternative spaces of belonging. A culturally nuanced approach makes essential work and social good connected in diverse ways, especially during challenging times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0440.024
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian and Pacific migration journalSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207