MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413202824 · doi:10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100637

Recent progress in flame retardancy of graphene and bio-based sustainable flame retardants for polymer composite applications

2025· article· en· W4413202824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComposites Part C Open Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsBeef Farmers of OntarioMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsFire retardantMaterials scienceComposite numberGrapheneComposite materialPolymerPolymer scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the restricted application of halogenated flame retardants (FRs), both industrial and academic sectors have endeavored to produce environmentally friendly, effective, and low-toxicity flame retardants for polymers. Bio-based FRs have attracted considerable interest due to their cost-effectiveness, widespread availability, and accessibility. Conversely, nanostructured graphene-based sustainable FRs provide further advantages to polymer composites beyond fire prevention, such as enhanced resistance to degradation, increased thermal stability, mechanical strength and extended lifespan. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the flame retardancy characteristics of polymers and their composites with newly developed bio-based and graphene-based sustainable FRs. The flame-retardant properties, mechanism, and synergistic effects of the recently developed graphene and bio-based (lignin, phytic acid, chitosan, tannic acid, polydopamine, vegetable oil, biocarbon and keratinous fiber) polymer composites are thoroughly discussed in this article. Graphene-based FRs enhance polymer flame resistance by dissipating heat, forming protective barriers, and promoting char formation, reducing heat and gas transfer. Similarly, nitrogen- and phosphorus-rich bio-based FRs improve fire safety by forming dense char layers that block heat and suppress flammable gas release. The superior flame retardancy of these FR-loaded polymer composites allows for their application across various industry sectors, including automotive, aerospace, electronics, military, and construction. However, challenges such as compatibility between the polymer matrix and FRs, expensive and complicated fabrication processes, limitations of raw material supplies and industrial scalability need to be further researched. In conclusion, these FRs offer a promising path toward safer, more effective, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-free and more sustainable flame-resistant polymer composites in key industrial sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it