MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

TemporalTemp: Encoding Historical Temperatures for Automated Sea Ice Mapping

2025· article· en· W4413206461 on OpenAlexaff
Jayden Hsiao, David A. Clausi, Linlin Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutions3v Geomatics (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoding (memory)Sea iceComputer scienceSea surface temperatureOceanographyGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the impact of incorporating historical ERA5 reanalysis data into deep learning models for Arctic sea ice parameter prediction. While existing approaches primarily rely on contemporaneous observations, we explore whether encoding temporal variations in ERA5 2-meter air temperature (t2m) can improve classification of sea ice concentration (SIC), stage of development (SOD), and floe size (FLOE). Using a multi-task U-Net architecture, we evaluate different temporal encoding strategies on the AI4Arctic dataset, comparing performance against a baseline model without historical context. Our results show that a 1-year encoding with 4 samples of 90 days each achieves the best overall performance (85.62% combined score), improving SOD and FLOE classification by 1.43% and 1.20% respectively. Qualitative analysis reveals that temperature encoding helps distinguish ice types during transitional seasons but can degrade SIC estimation during melt conditions when air temperatures become misleading indicators. These findings demonstrate that carefully designed temporal encodings can enhance sea ice classification while highlighting the need for complementary data sources to address limitations during melt periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→