Research on the Influencing Factors and Cultivation of Adolescents' Sense of Meaning in Life from the Perspective of Positive Psychology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, the mental health problems of adolescents are becoming increasingly serious, among which depression and suicide are closely related to the lack of a sense of meaning in life. From the perspective of positive psychology, the sense of meaning in life, as an important positive psychological resource, can help individuals cope with crises and setbacks, enhance psychological resilience, and promote physical and mental health. Based on Steger and Wong's theoretical framework, the study explored the positive factors affecting adolescents' sense of meaning in life, including positive emotions, positive personality traits (extraversion, appropriateness), and positive social organization systems (e.g., social connections, prosocial behaviors, and family upbringing styles). Based on these findings, this paper proposes a systematic cultivation strategy that integrates the construction of a multifaceted education system for positive emotions and meaning exploration, optimizes family upbringing to strengthen the sense of belonging and autonomy, expands opportunities for prosocial behaviors and social connections, and fosters positive traits and self-regulation abilities. The aim is to provide both theoretical and practical guidance on adolescents' mental health education and to contribute to the enhancement and comprehensive development of their sense of meaning in life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it