Functional Compound Bioaccessibility and Microbial Viability in Green and Black Tea Kombucha During Simulated Digestion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kombucha, a fermented tea beverage, is gaining popularity due to its rich content of bioactive compounds and associated health benefits. Kombucha fermentation involves a complex microbial consortium, including acetic acid bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, and yeasts, that works synergistically to enhance its nutritional and functional properties. Key compounds produced during fermentation provide antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial benefits. Despite its well-documented health-promoting properties, limited research exists on how human digestion influences the stability and functionality of kombucha bioactive components. This study investigated how digestion impacts kombucha made from green and black teas, focusing on free amino acid content, antioxidant activity, antimicrobial potential, and microbiota viability. Results showed that digestion significantly increased free amino acids, as fermentation released peptides suitable for gastrointestinal digestion. However, L-theanine, a beneficial tea compound, was no longer detectable after fermentation and digestion, suggesting limited bioaccessibility. Digested kombucha exhibited higher antioxidant activity and stronger antimicrobial effects compared to undigested tea. Moreover, culture-dependent and PMA-based sequencing confirmed the survival of viable microbial strains through simulated gastrointestinal conditions, suggesting the potential of kombucha as a source of live, functional microbes. These findings support the role of kombucha as a natural functional beverage whose health benefits not only persist but may be enhanced after digestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".