MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413220658 · doi:10.58931/cect.2025.4260

Approach to The Patient With Hypertensive Uveitis and Uveitic Glaucoma

2025· article· en· W4413220658 on OpenAlexaff
Carol Tadrous

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Eye Care Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUveitisGlaucomaOcular hypertensionIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyOptic neuropathyRetrospective cohort studyOptic nerveSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucomatous optic neuropathy are common complications in patients with uveitis. Ocular hypertension occurs in approximately 25% of uveitic patients. In addition, retrospective observational studies have found that 31-77% of patients with ocular hypertension had converted to glaucomatous optic neuropathy over a 10 year period. Ocular hypertension occurs in approximately 35% of children with uveitis, with secondary glaucoma occurring in 11-38%. Many of these children will require surgical glaucoma interventions: 11.5% at 1 year after a diagnosis of ocular hypertension, increasing to 50% by 5 years. In adults with non-infectious uveitis, the rate of surgical glaucoma interventions is between 20-40%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Eye Care TodaySame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207