MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413223742 · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.70142

Water‐saving strategies in rice farming entail cascading effects in prey–predator interactions across ecosystem boundaries

2025· article· en· W4413223742 on OpenAlexaff
Néstor Pérez‐Méndez, Gabriel Pompozzi, Maite Martínez‐Eixarch, Raül Llevat, Mar Català-Forner, Hugo J. Marrero

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsPredationIrrigationEcologyBiologyEcosystemPaddy fieldEnvironmental scienceAgricultureDitchPredatorSpiderTerrestrial ecosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Water‐saving irrigation strategies have been globally promoted to mitigate the contribution of flooded rice farming to climate change. While the positive effect of those strategies in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is undeniable, their potential cascading effects across the aquatic–terrestrial interface remain completely unexplored. For instance, multiple drainages throughout the rice cycle associated with alternative irrigation practices may disrupt the emergence of semiaquatic insects from rice fields, reducing prey availability for terrestrial predators and ultimately affecting their reproductive outcomes. Here, by using a 2‐year field‐scale experiment, we addressed these issues by comparing three irrigation strategies that represent a gradient of water use intensity throughout the rice growing season: Conventional permanent flooding (i.e. no drying periods) > mid‐season drainage (i.e. one single drying period; MSD) > alternate wetting and drying (i.e. multiple drying periods; AWD). Specifically, on each experimental plot, we quantified (i) the emergence of semiaquatic insects, (ii) the breeding activity (i.e. the breeding probability) of a jumping spider species (Bianor albobimaculatus, Salticidae) and (iii) its reproductive fitness (i.e. eggs/sac). Our results show that the emergence of semiaquatic insects and, therefore the availability of preys for spiders, were markedly reduced as water use decreased. In addition, while the breeding activity of jumping spiders did not differ among irrigation strategies, their reproductive fitness was severely compromised in the alternate wetting and drying strategy. Synthesis and applications. These results show that introducing multiple drainage periods in rice fields (i.e. AWD) indirectly hampers terrestrial spider reproduction through limiting the emergence of potential preys from the aquatic to terrestrial boundaries. MSD resulted in a more conciliatory strategy as it largely reduces methane emissions and does not affect predator–prey interactions; thus, it should be prioritized over AWD to minimize environmental trade‐offs. Our results highlight the need to account for potential trophic cascading effects when designing climate change mitigation strategies in agriculture to avoid undesirable side‐effects on agroecosystem functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied EcologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207