The Permaculture Alternative and Its Potential for Addressing Global Food Scarcity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This chapter provides a brief explanation of permaculture – a nature-based design system that offers the opportunity to establish productive, regenerative, ecologically inspired landscapes in contrast with chemical-dependent monocultures of conventional industrialized agriculture. It specifically explores the ways that permaculture has the potential to address many of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Of the several UNSDGs that permaculture can address, the most central are UNSDG 1: No Poverty and UNSDG 2: No Hunger. Prior to exploring permaculture’s application to addressing the UNSDGs, the chapter offers a definition of permaculture as well as discussing its origins, history, and application across the globe. The chapter concludes by discussing existing barriers to wider adoption of permaculture techniques, offering suggestions for how to overcome these barriers, and points to the need and opportunity for further research. While it is not widely studied by the scientific community, permaculture offers a fascinating and elegant approach to solving many problems of global sustainability. It is worthy of serious examination and consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".