MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413229613 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/addabb

PHANGS-HST Catalogs for ∼100,000 Star Clusters and Compact Associations in 38 Galaxies. II. Physical Properties from Decision-tree-based Spectral Energy Distribution Fitting of NUV-<i>U</i>-<i>B</i>-<i>V</i> <i>-</i> <i>I</i> Photometry with Categorical Priors Set by H<i>α</i> Emission, Cluster Morphology, and Other Auxiliary Information

2025· article· en· W4413229613 on OpenAlexaff
David A. Thilker, Janice Lee, Bradley C. Whitmore, Daniel Maschmann, Kiana F. Henny, Rupali Chandar, Daniel A. Dale, Sinan Deger, M. Boquien, Aida Wofford, Leonardo Úbeda, Alessandro Razza, Ashley T. Barnes, Francesco Belfiore, Frank Bigiel, Kathryn Grasha, Brent Groves, Hwihyun Kim, Ralf S. Klessen, Justus Neumann, Francesca Pinna, M. Jimena Rodríguez, Erik Rosolowsky, Eva Schinnerer, Thomas G. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsGalaxyStellar populationGlobular clusterPopulationStar clusterSpectral energy distributionMetallicityAstronomyStar formationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is the second in a series presenting the catalogs and properties of the largest sample to date of ∼100,000 star clusters and compact associations, in 38 spiral galaxies observed by the PHANGS-HST Treasury survey. Here, we present spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting techniques used to compute the age, mass, and reddening for each object. Our decision-tree-based strategy incorporates categorical priors on model age, reddening, and metallicity determined from additional observed parameters: localized H α emission, source morphology, and demographic-specific locations in the UBVI color–color diagram. This approach is implemented to mitigate model degeneracies, particularly between young dusty clusters and old clusters with minimal dust, which can have identical optical colors. Results based on H α narrowband imaging from the ground and from Hubble Space Telescope are intercompared, and contrasted with previous SED-fitting efforts. The fraction of the population that is subject to such priors is ∼14%, and of this subset, ∼63% of old globular clusters (GCs) have ages that change by a factor of 10 or more relative to unconstrained fits with single metallicity ( Z ⊙ ) simple stellar population models. The demographics of the population are examined through age–mass and age–reddening diagrams (for individual galaxies as well as aggregated over the sample), and the GC mass function. We demonstrate relationships between cluster age–mass diagrams and properties of parent galaxies (galaxy morphology and location relative to the galaxy main sequence). We outline continuing efforts to improve the inference of physical properties, including the incorporation of JWST infrared photometry and updated synthesis models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207