MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413229649 · doi:10.18280/isi.300607

A Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM Model for Minimizing Packet Loss in IoT-Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks

2025· article· en· W4413229649 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
G. N. Shwetha, Shashank Dhananjaya, H. Jagruthi, K. Sashi Rekha, R Pankaja, Abhilasha P Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceWireless sensor networkComputer networkNetwork packetPacket lossWirelessTelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensors embedded in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) form a foundation in the Internet of Things (IoT) architecture.Nonetheless, packet loss caused by unreliable communication, interference, and energy limitations continues to be a major issue.In this paper, we propose a Convolutional Neural Networks and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (CNN-BiLSTM) combined Deep Learning (DL) approach for packet loss minimization in IoT based WSNs.Our model uniquely integrates CNN to capture spatial features with a BiLSTM to capture temporal dependencies, allowing for more accurate inherent prediction of packet loss and intelligent routing in IoT-enabled WSNs.This hybrid design allows for the proposed model to outperform independent deep learning models and traditional routing protocols in both prediction accuracy and performance at the network level.Given the traditional models such as AODV and independent LSTM/CNN approaches.Proposed model has a packet loss reduction of 52%, an overall throughput improvement of 18.7%, and maintained low latency and energy consumption, contributing to the overall success of routing decisions in practical WSN scenarios.This makes the proposed hybrid model is highly suitable for the implementation in the real-time applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207