MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413231907 · doi:10.53452/gb2708

Review of the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world

2025· article· en· W4413231907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrii Luniachek

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo&Bio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteGeologyCratonGeochemistryArcheanChromiteUltramafic rockProterozoicIgneous rockPrecambrianTectonicsMantle (geology)Paleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kimberlite pipes are vertical or inclined cylindrical or cone-shaped bodies filled with kimberlite, an ultramafic igneous rock. The diameter of kimberlite pipes can vary from a few metres to 1.5 km, and their depth reaches several kilometres. The geological significance of kimberlite pipes is that they are the main source of diamonds and may contain other minerals: gold, platinum, ilmenite, rutile, and chromite. In addition, kimberlites provide valuable information about the composition and structure of the Earth’s mantle, as well as about deep magmatic processes. The article researches the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world. Kimberlite pipes can be found on all continents. Their location is uneven, with a fuzzy concentration in certain geographical regions. The main regions where kimberlite pipes are concentrated are South Africa, Yakutia, Canada, and Australia. In addition, kimberlite pipes have also been found in South America, West Africa, Northern Europe, India, and China. It has been shown that kimberlite pipes are located exclusively on continents within ancient platforms (cratons) with basement of Archean and Early Proterozoic age. Most of the pipes are located on basement elevations—shields, anteclises, and near rift zones. There are no kimberlite pipes in the oceans. The age of the pipes and the age of their host rocks do not correlate with each other. The age of the host rocks is Archean or Paleoproterozoic (3500 to 1600 Ma), while the age of kimberlite pipes varies in a wide range, from the Neoarchean to the Eocene (2800 to 45 Ma). In most diamond-bearing regions, there are kimberlite pipes located relatively close to each other, but with significantly different ages (for example, the Slave craton, the pipes of the Dayavik and Snap Lake deposits—55 and 535 Ma, respectively, with a distance of 100 km between them). Understanding the patterns of spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes should help to identify perspective areas for the exploration of new pipes, which may lead to the discovery of new diamond deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeo&BioSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207