MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413234932 · doi:10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i6.7113

Pengaruh Work Readiness terhadap Quarter Life Crisis pada Fresh Graduate

2025· article· en· W4413234932 on OpenAlex
Nurmina Nurmina

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSAQOFAH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)PsychologyHistoryEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze the effect of work readiness on the quarter-life crisis among 2024 fresh graduates in Padang City. A quantitative approach was employed, involving 150 fresh graduates selected through purposive sampling based on the criteria of graduating in 2024, being unmarried, and currently unemployed. Data were collected using two instruments: the quarter-life crisis scale developed by Hasyim (2024) and the work readiness scale by Wijayanti (2019). Data analysis was conducted using simple linear regression. The results show a significance value of 0.000 (p < 0.05) with a regression coefficient of −0.264, indicating a significant negative effect between work readiness and the quarter-life crisis. These findings suggest that the higher the level of work readiness, the lower the level of quarter-life crisis experienced by 2024 fresh graduates in Padang City.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it