MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413235639 · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114284

A marching cubes based method for topology changes in three-dimensional two-phase flows with front tracking

2025· article· en· W4413235639 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriele Gennari, C. Gorges, Fabian Denner, Berend van Wachem

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMarching cubesTopology (electrical circuits)Front (military)Tracking (education)Fast marching methodPhase (matter)MathematicsComputer scienceGeometryAlgorithmPhysicsCombinatoricsData miningMeteorologyVisualization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A front-tracking framework for the modeling of topology changes in two-phase flows is presented. • The marching cubes algorithm is used to perform a global reconstruction of the interface undergoing topology changes. • Robust framework applicable to complex breakup/coalescence phenomena. • Efficient framework where reconstruction operations are executed only when topology changes are detected. The handling of topology changes in two-phase flows, such as breakup or coalescence of interfaces, with front tracking is a well-known problem that requires an additional effort to perform explicit manipulations of the Lagrangian front. In this work, we present an approach that allows to perform topology changes with interfaces made of connected triangular elements. The methodology consists of replacing the fluid entities that undergo breakup/coalescence with the iso-surface corresponding to the indicator function value I = 0.5 , which automatically returns the shape of the bodies after topology changes. The generation and triangulation of such surface is obtained by exploiting the marching cubes algorithm. Since we perform the reconstruction of the interface only for the bodies that experience breakup/coalescence, the increase in computational cost with respect to a classic front tracking scheme without topology changes is small. Using validation cases, we show that the proposed reconstruction procedure is second-order accurate for volume conservation and able to capture the physics of several two-phase flow configurations undergoing topology changes. The validation cases include the breakup of a droplet in simple shear flow and two rising bubbles in different regimes (peripheral and central breakups). Coalescence is tested by modelling the binary collision between two droplets. For the selected validation cases, an excellent agreement between the numerical results and experiments is observed. The proposed methodology is able to capture the details of such interfacial flows, by predicting accurately the coalescence/breakup dynamics, as well as the number, size and shapes of satellite droplets/bubbles after topology changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational PhysicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207