MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A 3-D Physical Model Experimental Study of the ES-SAGD Process Utilizing Dimethyl Ether (DME) as a Solvent

2025· article· en· W4413236920 on OpenAlexafffund
Dennis Yaw Atta, Mabkhot BinDahbag, Hadi Bagherzadeh, Devjyoti Nath, S. Bukhari, Shakerullah Turkman, Hassan Hassanzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersKuwait Oil CompanySuncor Energy IncorporatedNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaImperial Oil LimitedCanadian Natural Resources LimitedCenovus EnergyUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsSteam-assisted gravity drainageSolventAsphaltOil sandsPetroleum engineeringChemistryPulp and paper industrySteam injectionHydrocarbonDimethyl etherChemical engineeringFossil fuelEnvironmental scienceWaste managementMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGeologyCatalysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a widely used method in the oil sands industry for recovering bitumen. However, it faces several challenges, such as high energy consumption, significant heat loss, and the emission of harmful gases that are detrimental to the environment. Hence, the introduction of Expanding Solvent-SAGD (ES-SAGD) combines the advantages of solvent and heat to help curtail these challenges while improving the process’s efficiency. In this work, we conducted three-dimensional physical model experiments (3DPMEs) of ES-SAGD using dimethyl ether (DME) as a solvent compared to a baseline conventional SAGD. The recovery factor, oil rate, water cut, cumulative gas production and composition, cumulative steam-oil ratio (SOR), gas-oil ratio (GOR), and energy reduction and carbon tax analysis are essential factors analyzed in this work. The result shows that coinjecting DME at low concentrations with steam significantly improves bitumen recovery rates compared to the baseline SAGD process. Furthermore, the average steam-oil ratio (SOR) as a measure of energy efficiency reduces from 9.4 for the conventional SAGD to 3.7, 2.14, and 4.3, representing a 60%, 77%, and 54% reduction for 1.25, 2, and 3 mol % DME in ES-SAGD, respectively. Additionally, the study reveals that the cumulative GOR generally increases as the solvent concentration increases. This study demonstrates that incorporating DME as a solvent compared to hydrocarbon solvents in the solvent-assisted thermal recovery process can significantly reduce the environmental impact of the oil sands sector. With a 47–69% reduction in CO 2 emissions, a lower steam-oil ratio, and greater carbon tax recovery, ES-SAGD using DME enhances energy efficiency, minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, and accelerates the transition to a low-carbon economy while improving overall sustainability in bitumen recovery compared to natural gas condensates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & Fuels→Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→