An Integrated Remote Sensing Lineament Investigation of the Manicouagan Region, Canada: Implications for Planetary Cratering Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Remote sensing data were deployed to create a lineament map (LM) of central Quebec, Canada. The LM provides a first‐order representation of the geological structures and is shown to co‐align with 45% of the structural features previously mapped in the area. Areas displaying partial or no alignment are attributed to inconsistent structural surficial expressions, indistinguishable edge gradients, obscurity by water, and spatial offsets. Despite these challenges, the LM has extended published structural features and extracted a substantial number of new linear features. The LM allows for the distinction between pre‐impact regional features from those generated by the Manicouagan impact event. Pre‐impact fault systems facilitated a polygonal form to the structure, rendering Manicouagan a polygonal impact crater. Combined with field‐based constraints, the LM results also reveal that the crater shows structural asymmetry, with more damage in the SW sector, expressed by enhanced concentric and radial faulting, and an elliptical collapsed transient cavity (orientated ∼70 km NE‐SW and 85 km NW‐SE). In addition, the central uplift is offset uprange from the geometric center to the NE and the central peak is breached, with a deeper footwall trench opening downrange to the SW. These observations indicate that Manicouagan may have been formed by a projectile traveling with a trajectory from the present‐day NE at an oblique angle. The distinction of pre‐impact target structures from impact‐generated features on Earth has implications for better understanding these features on other solid planetary bodies, comparisons with which are made from craters on the Moon, Mars and Mercury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".