MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413243979 · doi:10.1145/3747862

Real-Time Triangle-SDF Continuous Collision Detection 49

2025· article· en· W4413243979 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCollision detectionCollisionRobustness (evolution)Polygon meshComputer scienceAlgorithmIsosurfaceMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Visualization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce an efficient solution to the problem of continuous collision detection (CCD) between triangle geometry and signed distance fields (SDFs). We formulate the triangle-SDF collision problem as a novel spatio-temporal local optimization that solves for the first time of impact between a triangle and an SDF isosurface. Our method offers improved robustness over point sampling methods, and outperforms recent triangle-SDF discrete collision detection (DCD) algorithms. Furthermore, a novel method for adaptively refining the potential collision points on large triangles is proposed for robust triangle-SDF collision detection with coarse meshes. This enables the use of reduced geometry for efficient simulations. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach by comparing to state-of-the-art algorithms for triangle-SDF collision detection, and showcase its effectiveness through simulations involving complex collision scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it