MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413244493 · doi:10.53832/evidence-fund.0063

การพฒนารฐบาลดจทล ของประเทศไทยดวยขอมลเปด (Development of Thailand's Digital Government through Open Data)

2024· report· en· W4413244493 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Open Data Institute Open Data Institute

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Open governmentOpen dataGovernment (linguistics)Regional sciencePublic sectorOpen sourceE-GovernmentDigital governmentPolitical scienceBusinessPublic administrationGeographyInformation and Communications TechnologyComputer scienceDigital transformation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates opportunities to enhance Thailand's digital government through the strategic publication and use of open data. The research scope covers an assessment of the current open data landscape within the Thai public sector. It also incorporates a comparative analysis of international policies and initiatives, drawing on case studies from the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Serbia, Slovakia, and Uruguay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score1.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicICT Impact and Policies→French-language works237,207→