MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413245043 · doi:10.53832/evidence-fund.0040

Feasibility study for a high-resolution Southeast Asian air pollution forecasting system

2024· report· en· W4413245043 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaGovernment of the United Kingdom
KeywordsKuala lumpurScope (computer science)MegacityHo chi minhCollationSoutheast asiaGeographyAir pollutionMeteorologyWork (physics)PollutionHigh resolutionEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)CartographyRemote sensingComputer scienceEngineeringEconomyBusinessHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This feasibility study evaluates a coupled regional-to-local modelling approach for generating high-resolution, street-scale air pollution forecasts across Southeast Asia. The scope of the work includes the collation of model input data and the development of high-resolution emissions inventories. The system’s application is demonstrated within two domains: one encompassing the Kuala Lumpur mega-urban area in Malaysia, and another covering Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam and extending into Cambodia’s Svay Rieng Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→