MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comment on egusphere-2025-924

2025· peer-review· en· W4413246055 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Volcanic eruptions are crucial in the Earth's climate system, driving natural variability. Typically, sulfate aerosols generated by major volcanic events have persisted for years, cooling the Earth's surface while warming the stratosphere. The unprecedented submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) on January 15th, 2022, challenged this “paradigm” and offered a new perspective by injecting material up to the mesosphere. It led to a 10 % increase in the global stratospheric water vapor burden due to seawater injection, warming the Earth’s surface and competing with the sulfate-induced cooling. The resulting Stratospheric Aerosol Optical Depth appears to be much lower than that derived from satellite observations based on previous eruptions. This study shows a unique combination of balloon-borne and satellite-based measurements of the HTHH water-rich aerosol plume. We used an innovative balloon-based sampling technique and ion chromatographic analysis of the collected aerosol samples to suggest the presence of Na+, K+, NH4⁺, Ca2⁺, Cl⁻, and traces of SO42⁻, 8 months after the eruption, indicating its greater complexity than previously assumed. Based upon the chemical and optical balloon-borne and satellite observations, we suggest that marine aerosols played a role in accounting for the larger-than-expected aerosol burden compared to the modest 0.42 Tg SO2 injected. These findings encourage the inclusion of sea salt in addition to sulfate in climate models to correctly simulate the climatic impact of the Hunga eruption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0190.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3480.226

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Russian Policy Studies→French-language works237,207→