MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413246584 · doi:10.37766/inplasy2025.8.0024

Literature review protocol of essential frontline workers during disasters and crises to examine individual-family-work challenges

2025· report· en· W4413246584 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Classen, Haorui Wu, Kyle Breen, Siyu Ru, Samantha R. Good

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Protocol (science)PsychologyMedicineEngineeringAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review Stage at time of this submission -Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.108
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.108
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0350.018
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207