Recyclable High-Entropy Oxide Catalysts Unlock Lignocellulose Recalcitrance toward High Yield Xylochemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of catalysts that are both highly active and structurally stable is critical for addressing the inherent challenges posed by the recalcitrance of lignocellulose, which arises from the complex interconnections and varied chemical properties of lignocellulosic feedstocks. Consequently, there is a pressing need for efficient biorefinery strategies that facilitate the hierarchical separation of these components and their subsequent conversion to valuable chemicals. In this article, we introduce a two-step catalytic process that employs a spinel high-entropy oxide (HEO). This HEO benefits from a “cocktail effect”, wherein its high entropy confers numerous intrinsic oxygen vacancies, enhancing its oxygen adsorption and activation capabilities for oxidation catalysis. This approach allows for the efficient refinement of lignocellulose into fine chemicals and exhibits an enhanced performance under mild reaction conditions. The robustness and stability of HEO enable them to sustain a high catalytic activity and effectiveness through multiple catalytic cycles. Finally, we have successfully fractionated lignin into aromatic monomers with a yield of 42 wt % and achieved an impressive total carboxylic acid yield of 150 wt % relative to the original hemicellulose content. Additionally, the cellulose solid fraction, preserved during the HEO treatment, yielded 98.93 wt % glucose when chemically saccharified using a solvent mixture of zinc chloride and formic acid. This strategy represents a significant advance in biomass upgrading, demonstrating markedly higher chemical efficiency in comparison to previously reported methodologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".